People v. Sloane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sloane

284 A.D.2d 256, 726 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 A.D.2d 256 (People v. Sloane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sloane, 284 A.D.2d 256, 726 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered December 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence, including the victim’s credible testimony and the jury’s observation of her condition, clearly established the element of serious physical injury as charged by the court. The victim’s injuries included multiple facial scars, the loss of five teeth requiring oral surgery, a broken nose that required surgical reconstruction, the protrusion of her mouth to one side, a sagging right eye, and a resulting lisp (see, People v Martinez, 257 AD2d 667, lv denied 93 NY2d 974; People v Wade, 187 AD2d 687, lv denied 81 NY2d 894). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered December 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence, including the victim’s credible testimony and the jury’s observation of her condition, clearly established the element of serious physical injury as charged by the court. The victim’s injuries included multiple facial scars, the loss of five teeth requiring oral surgery, a broken nose that required surgical reconstruction, the protrusion of her mouth to one side, a sagging right eye, and a resulting lisp (see, People v Martinez, 257 AD2d 667, lv denied 93 NY2d 974; People v Wade, 187 AD2d 687, lv denied 81 NY2d 894). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 256, 726 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sloane-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack