People v. Slates
This text of 57 A.D.3d 266 (People v. Slates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). Defendant’s furtive behavior in attempting to purchase a MetroCard with multiple credit cards, viewed in light of the arresting officer’s training and experience regarding credit card fraud at MetroCard vending machines, justified a level two inquiry, which led to defendant’s production of two credit cards and his admission that they did not belong to him, furnishing probable cause for his arrest (see People v Wilson, 52 AD3d 239 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 743 [2008]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Gonzalez, Nardelli, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.3d 266, 870 N.Y.2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-slates-nyappdiv-2008.