People v. Slater

2016 NY Slip Op 6849, 143 A.D.3d 921, 38 N.Y.S.3d 919
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 2016·No. 2014-09162·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered *922 September 18, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, under superseding indictment No. 91/13, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered September 18, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, under indictment No. 80/12, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the validity of his pleas of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Williams, 27 NY3d 212 [2016]).

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, which does not directly involve the plea negotiation process (see People v Williams, 129 AD3d 1000, 1000 [2015]).

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Slater, 2016 NY Slip Op 6849, 143 A.D.3d 921, 38 N.Y.S.3d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 6849 (People v. Slater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rock
29 N.Y.3d 1085 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)