People v. Skipwith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Skipwith

139 A.D.3d 884, 29 N.Y.S.3d 822

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 2016

Docket2014-08866

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 884 (People v. Skipwith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Skipwith, 139 A.D.3d 884, 29 N.Y.S.3d 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the *885 County Court, Dutchess County (Hubert, J.), imposed September 17, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the *885 County Court, Dutchess County (Hubert, J.), imposed September 17, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.3d 884, 29 N.Y.S.3d 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-skipwith-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack