People v. Skipwith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Skipwith

20 A.D.2d 662, 246 N.Y.S.2d 545

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 662 (People v. Skipwith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Skipwith, 20 A.D.2d 662, 246 N.Y.S.2d 545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange 'County, dated January 30, 1963, which denied his motion for the return of certain property taken by the police, under a search warrant, in a raid on defendant’s residence. The denial was without prejudice to a timely application pursuant to section 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Defendant is presently under indictment charging various crimes; and the Seized property is part of the proof which the District Attorney states will be adduced upon the trial. Appeal dismissed. The order appealed from is an intermediate order from which a separate appeal does not lie (Code Crim. Pro., § 517; Matter of Police Benevolent Assn. v. Gagliardi, 9 A D 2d 929, affd. 9 N Y 2d 803; People v. Ruth, 250 App. Div. 819). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange 'County, dated January 30, 1963, which denied his motion for the return of certain property taken by the police, under a search warrant, in a raid on defendant’s residence. The denial was without prejudice to a timely application pursuant to section 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Defendant is presently under indictment charging various crimes; and the Seized property is part of the proof which the District Attorney states will be adduced upon the trial. Appeal dismissed. The order appealed from is an intermediate order from which a separate appeal does not lie (Code Crim. Pro., § 517; Matter of Police Benevolent Assn. v. Gagliardi, 9 A D 2d 929, affd. 9 N Y 2d 803; People v. Ruth, 250 App. Div. 819). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 662, 246 N.Y.S.2d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-skipwith-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack