People v. Skipper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Skipper

249 A.D.2d 425, 670 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 425 (People v. Skipper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Skipper, 249 A.D.2d 425, 670 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered June 4, 1996, convicting him of kidnaping in the second degree (two counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence on the fifth [426]*426count of the indictment charging sodomy in the first degree was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was not properly preserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Orsini, 246 AD2d 674).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered June 4, 1996, convicting him of kidnaping in the second degree (two counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence on the fifth [426]*426count of the indictment charging sodomy in the first degree was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was not properly preserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Orsini, 246 AD2d 674).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 425, 670 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-skipper-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack