People v. Skinner

723 N.W.2d 458, 477 Mich. 930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Skinner. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1093
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 2006·No. 131608·Published

Opinion

723 N.W.2d 458 (2006)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Dalmar SKINNER, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 131608. COA No. 266690.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 15, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for a determination of whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, for the appointment of appellate counsel, in light of Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605, 125 S.Ct. 2582, 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005). Appointed counsel may file an application for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the trial court, within twelve months of the date of the Saginaw Circuit Court's order appointing counsel, in accord with the deadlines in effect at the time the defendant was denied counsel. See MCR 7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429. Counsel may include among the issues raised, but is not required to include, those issues raised by the defendant in his application for leave to appeal to this Court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Skinner, 723 N.W.2d 458, 477 Mich. 930 (Mich. 2006).

723 N.W.2d 458 (People v. Skinner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halbert v. Michigan
545 U.S. 605 (Supreme Court, 2005)