Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Sivels

People v. Sivels

105 A.D.2d 858, 482 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20987
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 1984·Published

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lodato, J.), rendered June 17, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant’s failure to raise his objection to the adequacy of the plea allocution before the court of first instance precludes the preservation of his claim for appellate review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Santiago, 100 AD2d 857; People v McKenzie, 88 AD2d 646), and reversal would not be warranted in the interest of justice (People v Fernandez, 91 AD2d 1073). Boyers, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sivels, 105 A.D.2d 858, 482 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 858 (People v. Sivels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pascale
401 N.E.2d 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. McKenzie
88 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Fernandez
91 A.D.2d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Santiago
100 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)