People v. Siriani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Siriani

216 A.D.2d 595, 628 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7048

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 26, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), rendered December 15, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that reversal is war[596]*596ranted because the People failed to provide him with notice pursuant to Penal Law § 450.10 that the stolen property in question would be returned to the complainant prior to trial, since the record demonstrates that the defendant suffered no prejudice as a result thereof (see, Penal Law § 450.10 [10]; People v Kelly, 62 NY2d 516; People v McDonald, 199 AD2d 539; People v Dent, 183 AD2d 723; People v Nieves, 133 AD2d 234).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either improperly raised on appeal or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), rendered December 15, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that reversal is war[596]*596ranted because the People failed to provide him with notice pursuant to Penal Law § 450.10 that the stolen property in question would be returned to the complainant prior to trial, since the record demonstrates that the defendant suffered no prejudice as a result thereof (see, Penal Law § 450.10 [10]; People v Kelly, 62 NY2d 516; People v McDonald, 199 AD2d 539; People v Dent, 183 AD2d 723; People v Nieves, 133 AD2d 234).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either improperly raised on appeal or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Siriani, 216 A.D.2d 595, 628 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

216 A.D.2d 595 (People v. Siriani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related