People v. Singleton
This text of 213 A.D.3d 870 (People v. Singleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Singleton |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 00885 |
| Decided on February 15, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 15, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.
2021-03195
(Ind. No. 375/11)
v
Aaron Singleton, appellant.
Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, NY, for appellant.
Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (John Carmody of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), dated November 30, 2020, which denied, without a hearing, his motion, in effect, pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court (Richard A. Molea, J.) rendered February 9, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside the sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).
DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.3d 870, 182 N.Y.S.3d 638, 2023 NY Slip Op 00885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-singleton-nyappdiv-2023.