People v. Singleton

13 A.D.3d 116, 785 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Singleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 A.D.2d 1020

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered April 2, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly imposed an enhanced sentence after defendant clearly violated various terms of his plea agreement (see People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702 [1993]). Defendant’s argument that the sentencing court should have conducted a further inquiry as to whether he had successfully completed a drug treatment program is unpreserved and unavailing (see People v Rhymer, 3 AD3d 315 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 745 [2004]). In any event, there is no basis for dismissal of the indictment, the only relief defendant seeks on appeal. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Ellerin, Lerner, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Singleton, 13 A.D.3d 116, 785 N.Y.S.2d 686, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 116 (People v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Outley
80 N.Y.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Rhymer
3 A.D.3d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)