People v. Singleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Singleton

253 A.D.2d 909, 678 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 10, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 909 (People v. Singleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Singleton, 253 A.D.2d 909, 678 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered February 2, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads to the same conclusion. The record evinces that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 4V2 to 9 years in accordance with the relevant statutory requirements and the negotiated plea agreement. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., White, Yesawich Jr., Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered February 2, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads to the same conclusion. The record evinces that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 4V2 to 9 years in accordance with the relevant statutory requirements and the negotiated plea agreement. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., White, Yesawich Jr., Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 909, 678 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-singleton-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack