People v. Singleterry
158 A.D.2d 562, 551 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1990·Published
Opinion
The facts of this case were previously set forth by this court on the codefendant’s appeal (see, People v Ray, 140 AD2d 380). Inasmuch as the defendant raises claims identical to those raised by the codefendant on his appeal, which claims required reversal in that case (see, People v Ray, supra), we conclude, as the People concede, that the defendant’s judgment of conviction must be reversed.
[563]*563In view of our determination, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contention. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Hooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Singleterry, 158 A.D.2d 562, 551 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 562 (People v. Singleterry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ray
140 A.D.2d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)