People v. Singleterry

158 A.D.2d 562, 551 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752

This text of 158 A.D.2d 562 (People v. Singleterry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Singleterry, 158 A.D.2d 562, 551 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

The facts of this case were previously set forth by this court on the codefendant’s appeal (see, People v Ray, 140 AD2d 380). Inasmuch as the defendant raises claims identical to those raised by the codefendant on his appeal, which claims required reversal in that case (see, People v Ray, supra), we conclude, as the People concede, that the defendant’s judgment of conviction must be reversed.

[563]*563In view of our determination, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contention. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Hooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ray
140 A.D.2d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 562, 551 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-singleterry-nyappdiv-1990.