People v. Singletary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Singletary

282 A.D.2d 203, 722 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3392

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 203 (People v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Singletary, 282 A.D.2d 203, 722 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J.), rendered December 1, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Questions of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury, and there is no basis upon which to disturb its findings. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J.), rendered December 1, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Questions of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury, and there is no basis upon which to disturb its findings. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 203, 722 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-singletary-nyappdiv-2001.