People v. Singh
This text of 5 A.D.3d 403 (People v. Singh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered September 9, 2002, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the People failed to timely turn over an audiotape of a pertinent 911 telephone call pursuant to Brady v Maryland (373 US 83 [1963]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, since the defendant knew of the evidence and its exculpatory nature well [404]*404in advance of trial (see People v Doshi, 93 NY2d 499 [1999]), it was not Brady material (see People v Rodriguez, 223 AD2d 605, 606 [1996]; People v Banks, 130 AD2d 498, 499 [1987]).
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 403, 771 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-singh-nyappdiv-2004.