People v. Sinclair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sinclair

268 A.D.2d 540, 701 N.Y.S.2d 651, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 642

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 540 (People v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sinclair, 268 A.D.2d 540, 701 N.Y.S.2d 651, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 30, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion, made on the eve of trial, for yet another competency examination under CPL 730.30 (1) (see, People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757; People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878; People v Russell, 74 NY2d 901). The court properly relied on the most recent finding of competency, as well as upon its own observations of and interaction with the defendant, in concluding that there was no reasonable ground to believe that the defendant was an incapacitated person (see, People v Morgan, supra, at 880-881). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 30, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion, made on the eve of trial, for yet another competency examination under CPL 730.30 (1) (see, People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757; People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878; People v Russell, 74 NY2d 901). The court properly relied on the most recent finding of competency, as well as upon its own observations of and interaction with the defendant, in concluding that there was no reasonable ground to believe that the defendant was an incapacitated person (see, People v Morgan, supra, at 880-881). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 540, 701 N.Y.S.2d 651, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sinclair-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack