People v. Simpkins

126 A.D.2d 682, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Simpkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 A.D.2d 790

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), rendered March 4, 1983, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[683]*683The defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied for reasons stated by Judge Santagata (see also, People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Simpkins, 126 A.D.2d 682, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

126 A.D.2d 682 (People v. Simpkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McRay
416 N.E.2d 1015 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)