People v. Simons
82 A.D.3d 1132, 919 N.Y.2d 357
Opinion
[1133] The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the Supreme Court’s instructions to the jury. Viewing the Supreme Court’s charge as a whole, the instructions regarding credibility adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standard by which to evaluate the testimony of the complainant (see People v Gillyard, 70 AD3d 854, 855 [2010]; People v Francisco, 44 AD3d 870, 871 [2007]; People v Goodson, 35 AD3d 760, 761 [2006]; People v Hosannah, 2 AD3d 458, 459 [2003]). Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Simons, 82 A.D.3d 1132, 919 N.Y.2d 357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
82 A.D.3d 1132 (People v. Simons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hosannah
2 A.D.3d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Goodson
35 A.D.3d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Francisco
44 A.D.3d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Gillyard
70 A.D.3d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)