People v. Simons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Simons

82 A.D.3d 1132, 919 N.Y.2d 357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 1132 (People v. Simons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Simons, 82 A.D.3d 1132, 919 N.Y.2d 357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[1133]*1133The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the Supreme Court’s instructions to the jury. Viewing the Supreme Court’s charge as a whole, the instructions regarding credibility adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standard by which to evaluate the testimony of the complainant (see People v Gillyard, 70 AD3d 854, 855 [2010]; People v Francisco, 44 AD3d 870, 871 [2007]; People v Goodson, 35 AD3d 760, 761 [2006]; People v Hosannah, 2 AD3d 458, 459 [2003]). Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1133]*1133The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the Supreme Court’s instructions to the jury. Viewing the Supreme Court’s charge as a whole, the instructions regarding credibility adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standard by which to evaluate the testimony of the complainant (see People v Gillyard, 70 AD3d 854, 855 [2010]; People v Francisco, 44 AD3d 870, 871 [2007]; People v Goodson, 35 AD3d 760, 761 [2006]; People v Hosannah, 2 AD3d 458, 459 [2003]). Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.3d 1132, 919 N.Y.2d 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-simons-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack