People v. Simonds
537 N.E.2d 621, 73 N.Y.2d 945, 540 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 290
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) violation, *947 never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144, 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Simonds, 537 N.E.2d 621, 73 N.Y.2d 945, 540 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 290 (N.Y. 1989).
537 N.E.2d 621 (People v. Simonds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hendrix
12 Misc. 3d 447 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
People v. Delgado
202 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Davis
614 N.E.2d 719 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Jones
183 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Baez
166 A.D.2d 256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Rashid
164 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Reyes
162 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Davis
160 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Hentley
155 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)