People v. Simonds
This text of 537 N.E.2d 621 (People v. Simonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) violation, *947 never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144, 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 N.E.2d 621, 73 N.Y.2d 945, 540 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-simonds-ny-1989.