People v. Simon

34 A.D.3d 852, 823 N.Y.S.2d 906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), rendered November 9, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor committed misconduct during summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v LaValle, 3 NY3d 88, 114 [2004] ; People v Harris, 98 NY2d 452, 459 [2002]; People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886 [1991]). In any event, the contention is without merit since the challenged remarks either were fair comment on the evidence, permissible rhetorical comment, or responsive to the defense counsel’s summation (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 110 [1976]; People v Garner, 27 AD3d 764 [2006]). Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Simon, 34 A.D.3d 852, 823 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

34 A.D.3d 852 (People v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
58 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Wright
54 A.D.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. McKissick
36 A.D.3d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)