People v. Simo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Simo

104 A.D.2d 671, 479 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20081

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 671 (People v. Simo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Simo, 104 A.D.2d 671, 479 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), imposed May 7,1982, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree.

Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2Vs to 7 years. As so modified, sentence affirmed.

The People consent to a reduction of defendant’s sentence as herein provided, and, in our view, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Bracken and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), imposed May 7,1982, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree.

Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2Vs to 7 years. As so modified, sentence affirmed.

The People consent to a reduction of defendant’s sentence as herein provided, and, in our view, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Bracken and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 671, 479 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-simo-nyappdiv-1984.