People v. Simmons

6 A.D.3d 275, 774 N.Y.S.2d 695
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Simmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 A.D.2d 928

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered June 25, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

By failing to object, or by making a generalized objection, defendant did not preserve his present challenges to the prosecutor’s summation (see e.g. People v Harris, 98 NY2d 452, 491 n 18 [2002]) and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged remarks generally suggested reasonable inferences [276]*276from the evidence, and that the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 976 [1998]; People v D’Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Simmons, 6 A.D.3d 275, 774 N.Y.S.2d 695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 275 (People v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harris
779 N.E.2d 705 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. D'Alessandro
184 A.D.2d 114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Overlee
236 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)