People v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Simmons

279 A.D.2d 892, 719 N.Y.S.2d 614, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 722

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 892 (People v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Simmons, 279 A.D.2d 892, 719 N.Y.S.2d 614, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered April 25, 2000, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to time served, 180 days of electronic house monitoring and five years’ probation as a result of his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the second degree. As a condition to probation, defendant was to have no unsupervised contact with any persons less than 17 years old. Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the aforementioned condition of his probation and County Court revoked his probation and resentenced defendant to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant maintains that the agreed-upon sentence was harsh and excessive, especially given, inter alia, his youthful age and his depressed state at the time of resentencing and seeks to have the sentence reduced in the interest of justice. Notwithstanding defendant’s assertions, our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion on the part of County Court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention (see, People v Corpin, 269 AD2d 622, lv denied 95 NY2d 795).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered April 25, 2000, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to time served, 180 days of electronic house monitoring and five years’ probation as a result of his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the second degree. As a condition to probation, defendant was to have no unsupervised contact with any persons less than 17 years old. Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the aforementioned condition of his probation and County Court revoked his probation and resentenced defendant to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant maintains that the agreed-upon sentence was harsh and excessive, especially given, inter alia, his youthful age and his depressed state at the time of resentencing and seeks to have the sentence reduced in the interest of justice. Notwithstanding defendant’s assertions, our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion on the part of County Court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention (see, People v Corpin, 269 AD2d 622, lv denied 95 NY2d 795).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 892, 719 N.Y.S.2d 614, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-simmons-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack