People v. Simmons

293 N.E.2d 826, 31 N.Y.2d 997, 341 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1484
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 1973·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Upon application for assignment of counsel to prosecute an appeal from a judgment of conviction for harassment, the Appellate Term did not abuse its discretion in deter[998]*998mining that the defendants did not satisfactorily demonstrate that they were at that time financially unable to obtain counsel (see People v. Salman, 31 N Y 2d 841; People v. Hollis, 29 N Y 2d 727; cf. Matter of Legal Aid Soc. of Nassau County, N. Y. v. Samenga, 39 A D 2d 912).

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler concur; Judge Breitel taking no part.

In each ease: Order affirmed in memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Simmons, 293 N.E.2d 826, 31 N.Y.2d 997, 341 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1484 (N.Y. 1973).

293 N.E.2d 826 (People v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivera (Senate)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Carney v. Carney
2018 NY Slip Op 2034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Wheat
80 Misc. 2d 844 (New York County Courts, 1975)