People v. Silvers
This text of 503 N.E.2d 96 (People v. Silvers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the conviction vacated, and a new trial ordered.
*958 The People concede that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to represent himself on the ground that he was not sufficiently versed in the law to do so (see, People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d 10). The People’s alternative argument that the defendant should have been disqualified from acting as his own attorney because of his "deceptive character”, was not preserved for review in the trial court. In any event it is not a rational ground for disqualifying a defendant in a criminal case.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 N.E.2d 96, 68 N.Y.2d 957, 510 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-silvers-ny-1986.