People v. Silverman

New York Court of Common Pleas

People v. Silverman

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 897

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 897 (People v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Silverman, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 897 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The prisoner having been surrendered, and, upon confession, convicted and fined, and having paid his fine, a case is presented for the cancellation of the judgment against his surety when the application comes [898]*898properly before us. But our rule 13 requires that eight days’ notice shall he given the district attorney; and as, in this case, no notice whatever was given, the petition must be denied, witli leave, however, to renew. Application denied, with leave to renew on notice to the district attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The prisoner having been surrendered, and, upon confession, convicted and fined, and having paid his fine, a case is presented for the cancellation of the judgment against his surety when the application comes [898]*898properly before us. But our rule 13 requires that eight days’ notice shall he given the district attorney; and as, in this case, no notice whatever was given, the petition must be denied, witli leave, however, to renew. Application denied, with leave to renew on notice to the district attorney.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-silverman-nyctcompl-1893.