People v. Silvels
228 A.D.2d 527, 643 N.Y.2d 1006, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6558
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s challenges to the jury instructions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Jones, 55 NY2d 771, 773; People v Wynn, 200 AD2d 645, 646). In any event, the charge as a whole properly instructed the [528]*528jury regarding the burden of proof and the concept of reasonable doubt (see, People v Benjamin, 210 AD2d 418, 419).
Moreover, the sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Silvels, 228 A.D.2d 527, 643 N.Y.2d 1006, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 527 (People v. Silvels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Silvels
7 A.D.3d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)