People v. Sileo
This text of 294 A.D.2d 380 (People v. Sileo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered August 1, 2000, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (O’Dwyer, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement to law enforcement officials.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[381]*381The Supreme Court properly denied suppression of the defendant’s statement (see People v Burdo, 91 NY2d 146; People v Bing, 76 NY2d 331; People v Steward, 88 NY2d 496; People v Cawley, 76 NY2d 331). Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
294 A.D.2d 380, 741 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sileo-nyappdiv-2002.