People v. Sikes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sikes

2 A.D.3d 1362, 768 N.Y.S.2d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14342

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 1362 (People v. Sikes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sikes, 2 A.D.3d 1362, 768 N.Y.S.2d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of Chautauqua County Court (Ward, J.), entered February 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for substitution of counsel in the absence of a showing of good cause for the substitution (see People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]; People v Welch, 307 AD2d 776, 777 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 625 [2003]; People v Youngblood, 294 AD2d 954, 955 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 704 [2002]; People v Burgos, 291 AD2d 904 [2002], lv denied 97 NY2d 751 [2002]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of Chautauqua County Court (Ward, J.), entered February 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for substitution of counsel in the absence of a showing of good cause for the substitution (see People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]; People v Welch, 307 AD2d 776, 777 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 625 [2003]; People v Youngblood, 294 AD2d 954, 955 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 704 [2002]; People v Burgos, 291 AD2d 904 [2002], lv denied 97 NY2d 751 [2002]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 1362, 768 N.Y.S.2d 873, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sikes-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack