People v. Sierra

80 A.D.3d 786, 915 N.Y.S.2d 510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sierra. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 A.D.3d 1659

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered April 21, 2009, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of criminal contempt in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). The jury reasonably concluded from the evidence presented at trial that the defendant intentionally violated an order of protection requiring him to stay away from the complainant. The evidence demonstrated that, following the conclusion of a birthday party for their son at which the defendant had exercised his right of visitation, the defendant accosted the complainant in a parking lot regarding extending the visit, and struck her after she declined his request. Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sierra, 80 A.D.3d 786, 915 N.Y.S.2d 510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

80 A.D.3d 786 (People v. Sierra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)