People v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Siegel

207 A.D.2d 919, 616 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 919 (People v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Siegel, 207 A.D.2d 919, 616 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), rendered December 18, 1992, convicting him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), conspiracy in the fourth degree, riot in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to participate in the jury selection when the trial court seated two of the jurors that defense counsel had peremptorily challenged is without merit. The prosecution met its burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination (see, People v Simmons, 79 NY2d 1013). Furthermore, the defendant failed to articulate nonpretextual, racially neutral grounds for exercising the peremptory challenges (see, People v Miller, 144 AD2d 94).

We find that the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or do not require reversal in light of the overwhelming proof of guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), rendered December 18, 1992, convicting him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), conspiracy in the fourth degree, riot in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to participate in the jury selection when the trial court seated two of the jurors that defense counsel had peremptorily challenged is without merit. The prosecution met its burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination (see, People v Simmons, 79 NY2d 1013). Furthermore, the defendant failed to articulate nonpretextual, racially neutral grounds for exercising the peremptory challenges (see, People v Miller, 144 AD2d 94).

We find that the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or do not require reversal in light of the overwhelming proof of guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 919, 616 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-siegel-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack