People v. Sidibe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sidibe

114 A.D.3d 517, 982 N.Y.S.2d 807

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 2014·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about November 2, 2009, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Sweeny, J.E, Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered on or about November 2, 2009, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Sweeny, J.E, Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Gische, JJ.

People v. Sidibe, 114 A.D.3d 517, 982 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

114 A.D.3d 517 (People v. Sidibe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.