People v. Siders
This text of 140 A.D.2d 646 (People v. Siders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant failed to properly preserve for appellate review his claims of prosecutorial misconduct as he did not raise objections or request further curative instructions during trial (see, People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951; People v Jalah, 107 AD2d 762).
We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.D.2d 646, 528 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-siders-nyappdiv-1988.