People v. Sicardo

18 A.D.3d 676, 794 N.Y.S.2d 688

This text of 18 A.D.3d 676 (People v. Sicardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sicardo, 18 A.D.3d 676, 794 N.Y.S.2d 688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered December 12, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he should have been permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, Ritter, Santucci and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.3d 676, 794 N.Y.S.2d 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sicardo-nyappdiv-2005.