People v. Sibron

220 N.E.2d 805, 18 N.Y.2d 723, 274 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1151
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sibron. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 N.Y.2d 603
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 1966·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant-appellant under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated. Defendant argued that section 180-a of the New York Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional in that it authorizes an unreasonable search and seizure. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and held that the statute does not authorize an unreasonable search and seizure and that, in this case, there was no denial of defendant-appellant’s constitutional rights. [See 18 N Y 2d 603.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sibron, 220 N.E.2d 805, 18 N.Y.2d 723, 274 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1151 (N.Y. 1966).

220 N.E.2d 805 (People v. Sibron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.