People v. Shuman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shuman

213 A.D.2d 902, 624 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3050

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 902 (People v. Shuman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shuman, 213 A.D.2d 902, 624 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), rendered November 2, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.

Initially, we find no support in the record for defendant’s claim that his plea was not voluntary because he was HIV-positive at the time he entered his guilty plea and did so to avoid stigmatizing his son. A review of the plea minutes reveals that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. Defendant also contends that, given that he is suffering from a terminal illness, his sentence of 20 years to life on the murder conviction is harsh and excessive. Given the nature of the crime involved and the fact that the sentence is within the statutory parameters, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), rendered November 2, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.

Initially, we find no support in the record for defendant’s claim that his plea was not voluntary because he was HIV-positive at the time he entered his guilty plea and did so to avoid stigmatizing his son. A review of the plea minutes reveals that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. Defendant also contends that, given that he is suffering from a terminal illness, his sentence of 20 years to life on the murder conviction is harsh and excessive. Given the nature of the crime involved and the fact that the sentence is within the statutory parameters, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 902, 624 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shuman-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack