People v. Shuemake

2020 NY Slip Op 06963, 188 A.D.3d 610, 132 N.Y.S.3d 743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 2020
DocketInd No. 1702/18 Appeal No. 12474 Case No. 2019-2926
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06963 (People v. Shuemake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Shuemake, 2020 NY Slip Op 06963, 188 A.D.3d 610, 132 N.Y.S.3d 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Shuemake (2020 NY Slip Op 06963)
People v Shuemake
2020 NY Slip Op 06963
Decided on November 24, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: November 24, 2020
Before: Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

Ind No. 1702/18 Appeal No. 12474 Case No. 2019-2926

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Lamont Shuemake, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Christopher Michael Pederson of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Villegas, J.), rendered January 24, 2019, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate prison term of two years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison component of the sentence to concurrent terms of one year, and amending the sentence and commitment sheet in accordance with this decision, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

The parties agree that the Drug Type section of the sentence and commitment sheet should be amended to reflect that the correct drug is cocaine.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: November 24, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 06963, 188 A.D.3d 610, 132 N.Y.S.3d 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shuemake-nyappdiv-2020.