Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Shine

People v. Shine

195 A.D.2d 1087, 601 N.Y.S.2d 879
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 1087 (People v. Shine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Shine, 195 A.D.2d 1087, 601 N.Y.S.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), counsel is required to notify defendant in writing of defendant’s right to appeal in all cases (People v Kieffer, 191 AD2d 1050). No exception is made for defendants who waive their right to appeal (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273). Present—Callahan, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Boomer, JJ. (Filed June 30, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kieffer
191 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 1087, 601 N.Y.S.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shine-nyappdiv-1993.