People v. Shimukonas

94 A.D.3d 477, 944 N.Y.S.2d 712

This text of 94 A.D.3d 477 (People v. Shimukonas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Shimukonas, 94 A.D.3d 477, 944 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered on or about May 5, 2010, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A.D.3d 477, 944 N.Y.S.2d 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shimukonas-nyappdiv-2012.