People v. Sheriff

2025 NY Slip Op 02424
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 2025
DocketInd No. 1481/18; Appeal No. 4165; Case No. 2020-01302
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02424 (People v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sheriff, 2025 NY Slip Op 02424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Sheriff (2025 NY Slip Op 02424)
People v Sheriff
2025 NY Slip Op 02424
Decided on April 24, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 24, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.

Ind No. 1481/18|Appeal No. 4165|Case No. 2020-01302|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Swalihou Sheriff, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Megan Taeschler of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Rafael Curbelo of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), entered on or about January 31, 2020, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). Defendant's argument as to his criminal history is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, there were no mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. Further, defendant did not demonstrate that his Correction Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions Risk and Need Assessment (COMPAS risk assessment) for anticipated re-entry, which is used to assist the Department of Correction and Community Supervision's staff to supervise a releasee, warranted a downward departure (see e.g. People v Castillo, 211 AD3d 648, 649 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 912 [2023]; People v Roldan, 140 AD3d 411, 412 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 904 [2016]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 24, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Roldan
140 A.D.3d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sheriff-nyappdiv-2025.