People v. Shepherd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shepherd

238 A.D.2d 610, 657 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 610 (People v. Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shepherd, 238 A.D.2d 610, 657 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered November 17, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that a police detective improperly testified as to the contents of another officer’s complaint report is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Rivera, 223 AD2d 476).

[611]*611The defendant’s further contention that the detective made an improper reference to a photographic identification of the defendant is also unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v West, 56 NY2d 662). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered November 17, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that a police detective improperly testified as to the contents of another officer’s complaint report is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Rivera, 223 AD2d 476).

[611]*611The defendant’s further contention that the detective made an improper reference to a photographic identification of the defendant is also unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v West, 56 NY2d 662). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 610, 657 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shepherd-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack