People v. Shepherd
196 N.W.2d 40, 38 Mich. App. 284
This text of 196 N.W.2d 40 (People v. Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Shepherd, 196 N.W.2d 40, 38 Mich. App. 284 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a business place with intent to commit larceny therein, and he appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.
Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 N.W.2d 40, 38 Mich. App. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shepherd-michctapp-1972.