People v. Shepherd
196 N.W.2d 40, 38 Mich. App. 284
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a business place with intent to commit larceny therein, and he appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.
Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Shepherd, 196 N.W.2d 40, 38 Mich. App. 284 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
196 N.W.2d 40 (People v. Shepherd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.