People v. Shepardson

48 Cal. 189
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
DocketNo. 10,089
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 48 Cal. 189 (People v. Shepardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Shepardson, 48 Cal. 189 (Cal. 1874).

Opinion

By the Court:

1. The indictment first charges the defendants as principals, and, in a second count, as accéssories, or rather as principals in the second degree. We see no objection to the indictment on this ground, under section nine hundred and fifty-four of the Penal Code. We think that that section, while changing' the phraseology, did not alter the substance óf section two hundred and forty-one of the Criminal Practice Act, which it supplanted.

2. But the judgment against the defendant is erroneous, because of the fifteenth instruction, in which the jury were told that, if the prisoner received a portion of the money obtained by the robbery, with the knowledge how it had been obtained, then he might be convicted of the crime of robbery charged in the indictment.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Superior Court
345 P.2d 513 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
People v. Enriquez
102 P.2d 770 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Dent v. State
65 S.W. 627 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1901)
Street v. State
45 S.W. 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shepardson-cal-1874.