People v. SHEMANSKI
This text of 742 N.W.2d 360 (People v. SHEMANSKI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Phillip Raymond SHEMANSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
*361 MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 N.W.2d 360, 480 Mich. 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shemanski-mich-2007.