People v. Sheldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sheldon

262 A.D.2d 1060, 692 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7309

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 1060 (People v. Sheldon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sheldon, 262 A.D.2d 1060, 692 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). The charge arose when police officers investigating an alarm sounding at a building on 200 East Avenue at about 2:30 a.m. observed defendant crawl through a [1061]*1061broken window and hide behind a dumpster. Audiotapes were found on defendant’s person, as well as on the ground and on the windowsill of the broken window. Defendant testified that he was on his way home, heard the alarm sounding, and entered the building to prevent a crime in progress.

We reject the contention of defendant that his testimony provided a rational basis for the jury to reject the prosecutor’s evidence on the issue of intent and thus that County Court erred in denying defendant’s request to charge criminal trespass in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary in the third degree. There was no reasonable view of the evidence to support a finding that defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater (see, People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 64). If defendant’s version of the events were believed, defendant would not be guilty of any crime.

The court properly replaced a sworn juror with an alternate juror. On Friday morning, when the court’s charge was to be given, a sworn juror telephoned the court clerk and indicated that he was sick with the flu and could not come in that day. The court denied defendant’s request to adjourn the trial until Monday, noting that three days between summations and the charge would be too long. There was no reason to delay the proceedings at a point so close to their conclusion on the chance that the absent juror would be available on the following Monday (see, People v McDonald, 143 AD2d 1050, 1052, lv denied 73 NY2d 857). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). The charge arose when police officers investigating an alarm sounding at a building on 200 East Avenue at about 2:30 a.m. observed defendant crawl through a [1061]*1061broken window and hide behind a dumpster. Audiotapes were found on defendant’s person, as well as on the ground and on the windowsill of the broken window. Defendant testified that he was on his way home, heard the alarm sounding, and entered the building to prevent a crime in progress.

We reject the contention of defendant that his testimony provided a rational basis for the jury to reject the prosecutor’s evidence on the issue of intent and thus that County Court erred in denying defendant’s request to charge criminal trespass in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary in the third degree. There was no reasonable view of the evidence to support a finding that defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater (see, People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 64). If defendant’s version of the events were believed, defendant would not be guilty of any crime.

The court properly replaced a sworn juror with an alternate juror. On Friday morning, when the court’s charge was to be given, a sworn juror telephoned the court clerk and indicated that he was sick with the flu and could not come in that day. The court denied defendant’s request to adjourn the trial until Monday, noting that three days between summations and the charge would be too long. There was no reason to delay the proceedings at a point so close to their conclusion on the chance that the absent juror would be available on the following Monday (see, People v McDonald, 143 AD2d 1050, 1052, lv denied 73 NY2d 857). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 1060, 692 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sheldon-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack