People v. Sheffield
198 A.D.2d 887, 606 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sheffield. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 A.D.2d 256 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for review his contention that the police implicitly bolstered identification testimony and we decline to review that issue in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Sheffield, 198 A.D.2d 887, 606 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
198 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.