People v. Shearer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shearer

301 A.D.2d 681, 752 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 2, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 301 A.D.2d 681 (People v. Shearer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shearer, 301 A.D.2d 681, 752 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 24, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to 3 to 9 years in prison. We are unpersuaded by defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive. Given defendant’s criminal background, which was amassed over a short period of time, and that the sentence was consistent with the plea agreement, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see People v McCray, 243 AD2d 953; People v Roberts, 186 AD2d 842).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 24, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to 3 to 9 years in prison. We are unpersuaded by defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive. Given defendant’s criminal background, which was amassed over a short period of time, and that the sentence was consistent with the plea agreement, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see People v McCray, 243 AD2d 953; People v Roberts, 186 AD2d 842).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 681, 752 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shearer-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack