People v. Shaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shaw

277 A.D.2d 1052, 715 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1052 (People v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shaw, 277 A.D.2d 1052, 715 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The jury was entitled to resolve the credibility issues against defendant, and we cannot conclude that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Defendant failed to object to the jury charge and thus failed to preserve for our review his contentions concerning alleged errors in the charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, those contentions are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The jury was entitled to resolve the credibility issues against defendant, and we cannot conclude that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Defendant failed to object to the jury charge and thus failed to preserve for our review his contentions concerning alleged errors in the charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, those contentions are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1052, 715 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shaw-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack