People v. Shaw

168 A.D.2d 924, 566 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Shaw. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 A.D.2d 626

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant did not preserve for our review his contention that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to give a more extensive identification instruction (see, People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 279; People v Beasley, 114 AD2d 415) and we decline to review that issue in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]). Finally, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.—robbery, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Shaw, 168 A.D.2d 924, 566 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

168 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Whalen
451 N.E.2d 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Beasley
114 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)