People v. Shavers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Shavers

205 A.D.2d 395, 613 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 395 (People v. Shavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Shavers, 205 A.D.2d 395, 613 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert L. Cohen, J.), rendered November 22, 1989, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of sodomy in the first degree (2 counts), and sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 3 to 9 years for the sodomy counts, and 2-Vs to 7 years for the sexual abuse count, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly permitted the seven-year-old complainant to testify under oath. The voir dire established that she understood the nature and consequences of an oath (CPL 60.20 [2]), since she knew the difference between the truth and a lie, and that the word "swear” means "that you will always tell the truth” (see, People v Parks, 41 NY2d 36, 50). That a child states she would lie to protect her mother from being hurt does not, standing alone, require a contrary finding.

Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim [396]*396that the expert witness’ testimony went beyond explaining behavior not within the jury’s understanding (CPL 470.05), and we decline to review in the interest of justice. In any event, the claim is meritless since the testimony was offered to establish unusual behavior manifestations in some sexually abused children, and not to prove that complainant exhibited any of the manifestations (see, People v Taylor, 75 NY2d 277). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert L. Cohen, J.), rendered November 22, 1989, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of sodomy in the first degree (2 counts), and sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 3 to 9 years for the sodomy counts, and 2-Vs to 7 years for the sexual abuse count, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly permitted the seven-year-old complainant to testify under oath. The voir dire established that she understood the nature and consequences of an oath (CPL 60.20 [2]), since she knew the difference between the truth and a lie, and that the word "swear” means "that you will always tell the truth” (see, People v Parks, 41 NY2d 36, 50). That a child states she would lie to protect her mother from being hurt does not, standing alone, require a contrary finding.

Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim [396]*396that the expert witness’ testimony went beyond explaining behavior not within the jury’s understanding (CPL 470.05), and we decline to review in the interest of justice. In any event, the claim is meritless since the testimony was offered to establish unusual behavior manifestations in some sexually abused children, and not to prove that complainant exhibited any of the manifestations (see, People v Taylor, 75 NY2d 277). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 395, 613 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-shavers-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack